It's all about the the creation of a new trendy bottle of perfume:
" The final achievement is nevertheless a true fashion symbol"
" The final achievement is nevertheless a true fashion symbol"
FASHION
An old adage goes “Beauty covers what lies within” gauges a message that has been distributed in time. We tend to live with the thought that we would neither live pretty outside to cover our pains and struggles inside. It covers our real world. Experts often exemplify and continues to dig up and nurture a world where we can see on outer self.
We behave in accordance with how other people react in our outlooks. We make it sure that we are fashionable enough to go with the trend....Oh so well..what can fashion do to us? In the world of fashion, a mean and an escape to our anxieties, a door to happiness and a key to inner peace? How can a man be fashionable?
There are, but a few questions fashion has something to do about. Fashion ultimately describe why people, office workers, students and even performing artists keep and do daily care regimen, share pieces of information and techniques so as to look sophisticated, well-groomed and appeal corporate image that a person tend to look up to.
Magazines, brochures, and other informative details were distributed and aired on radios and TV’s to continually share and acquaint everyone to be able to answer queries and tips to be applied about. And we can even browse on different websites to gather the said information. Fashions also reveals a productive venture for business-minded person for it already shows the real world bringing people the art which experts have researched and studied on time that is applicable to daily undertakings.
Fashion is not merely wearing make-ups, sporty get-ups, new gadgets and new mood of styles. It also draws a person’s attitude, seems so broad right? Well, attitude signifies the total personality of a person, on how he put out over simple things, practicing etiquette on public putting emphasis in every behavioral practices.
The industry of fashion nowadays portrays how talented people are, how magnificient their simple act making it too stunning. A lot of opportunities awaits to those who draw himself and get into fashion.
A total appealing person not only describes that he is to wear expensive outfits, even facncy apparel will do. What’s important is how you certainly and uniquely carry yourself. We would dare say he is out of fashion for not wearing environment’s trends. He can be fashionable enough as ling as he behave in accordance with what is proper to be worn. He can be fashionable in any reason he can. He’s of being unique is more importantly to consider and be adhere into.
The idea of being so fashionable is like drawing your own self, making a portray when you can see yourself so confident and beautiful not just over the touches of color you applied but the inner description you have and the combination of strokes on your canvass.
We should bear in our mind that being fashionable is revealing your real self equipped with principle and giving importance to everything he dealt with.
TRUE FASHION BEGINS HERE…..
Established in 1978, Fashion was an English band that formed in the dying days of punk. This was also a period of music history when bands frequently changed names. 'Fashion' started out with the name Fashion Music, but dropped 'Music' a few years later. Just to keep to keep the French mistranslations rolling, they released an album in 1982 called Fabrique. Beautifully chosen, this French word doesn't mean fabric, but factory.
As a footnote: Fashion toured in 1980 with bands such as Duran Duran (who opened for them), The B52s, The Police and U2. However we can't find any evidence that they ever toured with Depeche Mode. If they had also joined up with the very short-lived band 'News', the headline could have been Fashion, News, Depeche Mode.
You are here: Depeche Mode - the real meaning of the name (it's not Fast Fashion) Established in 1978, Fashion was an English band that formed in the dying days of punk. This was also a period of music history when bands frequently changed names. 'Fashion' started out with the name Fashion Music, but dropped 'Music' a few years later. Just to keep to keep the French mistranslations rolling, they released an album in 1982 called Fabrique. Beautifully chosen, this French word doesn't mean fabric, but factory.
As a footnote: Fashion toured in 1980 with bands such as Duran Duran (who opened for them), The B52s, The Police and U2. However we can't find any evidence that they ever toured with Depeche Mode. If they had also joined up with the very short-lived band 'News', the headline could have been Fashion, News, Depeche Mode.
1. Views of my friends n mine about the sameI
I recently had an epiphany a few weeks while chatting with one of my friends. The conversation somehow landed on the topic of grotesque runaway fashion shows. He made a comment about how the fashion designers design clothes and not something better. I asked him what he meant by "something better" to which he replied "looking good."
I thought that a rather strange response at the time, but later, thinking on what he had said it occurred to me what he had meant. Such fashion designers design clothes as "Art" meant to be controversial, or to simply be different, etc. But people originally invented the idea of fashion and style to make a person look good. I think that is an idea that has been quite lost in the anything goes world of today's fashion. People nowadays will essentially dress to wear clothes, rather than dressing to look good. here are some examples courtesy of balcktieguide.com
I'm not worried about the relative correctness of impropriety of either persons dress, but rather the aesthetic implications. The gentleman on the top simply looks better, and there are specific reasons that the mixture of colors work together to frame his face and flatter his body. As for the bottom picture, that young man only wears the clothes because they are clothes. If you could make a painting out of these two photographs, and blur the clothes, the person on top would still look better because he isn’t wearing a mixture of unharmonizing pieces.
I believe that clothing and fashion in today's world have lost their way a bit, and certainly what looks good is no longer on the minds of many clothing retailers and fashion designers. It would be interesting to see what creative minds like that could come up with if they stopped modifying already existing garments and started to work to create new things that would create new ways to flatter the body, or look good - form an aesthetic viewpoint, thinking in reference to colors, fit, the geometry of the pieces, etc.
If anyone has any thoughts to share on this issue, please do so, I am interested to hear what the people's opinions on this are.
I thought that a rather strange response at the time, but later, thinking on what he had said it occurred to me what he had meant. Such fashion designers design clothes as "Art" meant to be controversial, or to simply be different, etc. But people originally invented the idea of fashion and style to make a person look good. I think that is an idea that has been quite lost in the anything goes world of today's fashion. People nowadays will essentially dress to wear clothes, rather than dressing to look good. here are some examples courtesy of balcktieguide.com
I'm not worried about the relative correctness of impropriety of either persons dress, but rather the aesthetic implications. The gentleman on the top simply looks better, and there are specific reasons that the mixture of colors work together to frame his face and flatter his body. As for the bottom picture, that young man only wears the clothes because they are clothes. If you could make a painting out of these two photographs, and blur the clothes, the person on top would still look better because he isn’t wearing a mixture of unharmonizing pieces.
I believe that clothing and fashion in today's world have lost their way a bit, and certainly what looks good is no longer on the minds of many clothing retailers and fashion designers. It would be interesting to see what creative minds like that could come up with if they stopped modifying already existing garments and started to work to create new things that would create new ways to flatter the body, or look good - form an aesthetic viewpoint, thinking in reference to colors, fit, the geometry of the pieces, etc.
If anyone has any thoughts to share on this issue, please do so, I am interested to hear what the people's opinions on this are.
I've found this to be an easy distinction, and one that friends in the fashion industry agree with.
Fashion is seasonal and ever-changing. What is fashionable today, this month, or this year, may not be fashionable tomorrow, next month, or next year. However, style is timeless. It may lead to comments about dressing like you're from another era when taken to a certain point (spectator shoes or a fedora for example), but the consensus will be that you are stylish, not necessarily fashionable. I'll take stylish any day.
Fashion is seasonal and ever-changing. What is fashionable today, this month, or this year, may not be fashionable tomorrow, next month, or next year. However, style is timeless. It may lead to comments about dressing like you're from another era when taken to a certain point (spectator shoes or a fedora for example), but the consensus will be that you are stylish, not necessarily fashionable. I'll take stylish any day.
What’s missing? That part of this box where I said I'm always looking for......and I've yet to get a single freaking' PM. So, let’s go with my email signature quote:
Drive thy business or it will drive thee
Drive thy business or it will drive thee
I agree with you TheGreatTwizz but my point was slightly more than fashion versus style - I believe that issue has been put to rest by many before us. My point was more in line with the idea that clothing should be made for an aesthetic purpose that blends the pieces together. Rather than just donning clothes to wear clothes, one should dress to enhance his natural physique. If someone looked at a man who was well-dressed from far away, and (for example) the person in the bottom picture above, He the man who was well-dressed would appear better looking by the color and cut of his clothes, while the other would simply appear as a splotch of unrelated colors.
Agreed. This is a point I've made a number of times in the past. The "designer" clothing industry is fundamentally flawed, because it is mostly geared towards self-gratification of the "artiste" designer and his/her incestuous circle of like-minded friends; it has little to no regard for flattering or improving the appearance of the average person. Of course, it would be difficult to do anything so wildly new as to satisfy an "artiste" if flattering a wearer were the objective, since men's clothing got fairly optimal in that regard about 80 years ago. The only way to "innovate" and "create" is to either tinker at the edges, execute with better craftsmanship, or move downward from that optimal point.
Thus the reasons that fashion houses come and go but Sayville Row tailoring firms rumble along for centuries. Some designers never outgrow the 'Look at Meeeeee . . ." stage of adolescence, whether their first customers do or not. Antony Price is a prime example of this. I rather suspect that a fair percentage of his earliest clients no longer patronize him because they have outgrown Fashion and now prefer Style.
Half fashion plate, half slob.
"You have to care.
Only in that way
can you look as if
You do not."--Flanderian
"You have to care.
Only in that way
can you look as if
You do not."--Flanderian
Style is a bedrock concept that changes rarely (though how it's applied can be less durable). It's based on more firm concepts like masculinity, femininity, sociology, psychology, geometry/biological architecture, etc.
Fashion is the temporary applications, evolutions, and engineering of these things for the purposes of modernity, of-the-mementoes, exploration, or change for change's sake. It's a way to adapt and toy with things in a temporary way.
Think of style like macro evolution, and fashion as micro evolution. Both are important in their context, but in the hierarchy style is the thing you want to be wisest about. It is the foundation.
Fashion is the temporary applications, evolutions, and engineering of these things for the purposes of modernity, of-the-mementoes, exploration, or change for change's sake. It's a way to adapt and toy with things in a temporary way.
Think of style like macro evolution, and fashion as micro evolution. Both are important in their context, but in the hierarchy style is the thing you want to be wisest about. It is the foundation.
"Take a simple idea and take it seriously." --Charlie Monger
.jpg)
